Co:?; Enq:?; Loc:?; Q:?; ETy:?; iVis:?;

[ETypeTitle]

Response to enquiry
[EnqName]

What I am looking for:
[EnqNote]

• [#number] established contacts (if any: give number for current enquiry, but page shows all)
• [#] on this enquiry, open invitations from others
• [#] correspondents
• (the following only if 1 to 9 correspondents)
• Examine correspondents

For the enquiry just made:

Questions not yet answered if 0 fit

Rated essential by near-correspondents

• [QTitle] consider answering
• location requested

Most generally rated as essential

• [QTitle] consider answering

Rated desirable by correspondents

• [QTitle] consider answering

Rated desirable by near-correspondents

• [QTitle] consider answering

Most generally rated as desirable

• [QTitle] consider answering

My Answers used in this enquiry if > 0 fit

Rated essential by correspondents

• [QTitle] [MyAns] retry with this answer muted
• [follow-on QTitle] [MyAns] retry with this answer muted
• [QTitle] [MyAns] retry with this answer muted

Rated desirable by correspondents

• [QTitle] [MyAns] retry with this answer muted
• [follow-on QTitle] [MyAns] retry with this answer muted
• [QTitle] [MyAns] retry with this answer muted

My Answers muted in this enquiry in every case

• [QTitle] [MyAns] [in demand?] retry with this answer unmuted
• [QTitle] [MyAns] [in demand?] retry with this answer unmuted
• [QTitle] [MyAns] [in demand?] retry with this answer unmuted

---

View all my answers.

---

Edit this enquiry.

Diagnostics: ?

This is one of the vital, central pages of RegenCHOICE. This gives the results of the enquiry.

The system presents which answers are wanted by near-correspondents, who are those where there is information lacking on either side. There is no need to have all these categories used. Two unanswered questions would be sufficient.

The system presents which answers are used in correspondences, so that user gets a feel of the basis of the correspondence.

---

Information required and sources

See enquiry info

Key: {EnqID}

for the enquiry itself and its location:

• {ETypeTitle} ← {ETypeID}
• {EnqName}
• {EnqNote} – notes for enquiry

answers relevant to this enquiry

• {QID}
• {QTitle}
• {MyAns}
• {EQMuteB}
• including QIS → question titles for selected Qs not answered
• QIS → dependent question for each of these questions
• QIS → sub- and super-question relationships
• HUB → stats for answered, and answered in wanted way

---

Pre-processing

• the results of the enquiry processing
• № established contacts on this enquiry
• № correspondents on this enquiry
• overall № correspondents
• LSV → invitations on this enquiry
• questions not yet answered
• whether my muted answers are relevant to others
• which dependent questions, if there are any, to display

---

What the user is doing

• Reviewing the number of correspondences, and based on that, deciding either to
• examine correspondents,
• mute or unmute relevant answers,
• further edit the enquiry

Feedback is by comparing number of correspondences resulting.

---

Post-processing

• muting / unmuting changes

---

Information output

• current question (or answer, but still question ID)
• muting information

---

Notes

Think, that even if I have loads of correspondences, and therefore I cannot move on to examining correspondents, I might be invited by someone else.

How best to put in which answers used? The point here is that we want to highlight not only actual correspondences. When there are lots of correspondences, just use those. When no correspondences at all, put in likely usage, somehow... ?

Muting is also done through the my-answer-enqs page