Co:?; Enq:?; Loc:?; Q:?; ETy:?; iVis:?;

Enquiry type: [ETypeLabel]

Enquiry: [EnqName]

Move to contact [CoNo]

(if so) The nickname I use for this contact: [CoNick]

If the other party has invited me Pressing this will result in me exchanging contact details with my correspondent, and sharing any notes on wants from enquiries or questions [which contact details] [any charges to be applied]

establish contact by exchanging details

If the contact is still unknown Pressing this will result in giving my correspondent the option of establishing contact by exchanging contact details [MyDetails] [explanation of any charges that would result]

invite contact with this correspondent

Diagnostics: ?

page used only if not blocked and contact not yet established.

Information required and sources

Key: {CoNo}; {EnqID}

• {ETypeLabel} ← {ETypeID}
• {EnqName}
• {CoNick}
• uses {CoStatus}, {CoMyStatus} – status of correspondent
• {MyDetails}

---

Pre-processing

• System checks if there is still a match with this correspondent
• and that {ContactB} is still false

---

What the user is doing

• review the effects of moving forward with contact
• weigh up for an informed decision on whether to proceed

---

Post-processing

• either add invitation to list
• or move from invited to established

---

Information output

• appropriate changes in contact status

---

Issues

Now fairly sure that contact messaging through the system would be a bad idea. It could lead to bullying, people being pressured to reveal their contact details before the other one withdraws.

One interesting thought is, what happens if this is a multi-way match? Can one of the matching conditions be whether it is a whole match or a partial group? When two people have agreed on a multi-way, do they somehow become one unit? Conclusion: leave multi-way matching to later.